Why a women’s entrepreneur zone in Red Hills catchment area is a bad move

Eating away the green spaces

Support Citizen Matters - independent, Reader-funded media that covers your city like no other.
Do you want to see journalism on topics that matter to you? That provides understanding and perspective, that is based on solid research and data.
Get in-depth and insightful stories on issues that affect you every day!
A view of the Red hills reservoir. Pic: Laasya Shekhar

Red Hills Reservoir is in the news again. As per news reports, the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) had accepted an application from the Small Industries Development Corporation (SIDCO) to allocate around 54 acres of land in the Red Hills catchment area for the construction of a women’s entrepreneur zone.

Advertisement

This land is designated as ‘Redhills catchment area’ in the Master Plan 2026; that is, no construction or development activity is allowed here. But once the project is approved, the land use will be changed to ‘industrial’. The move has elicited criticism from citizens of Chennai, reeling as they are under severe water shortage.

Now, it is not clear what the outcome of the application is. A few news reports have stated that the Public Works Department (PWD) has started desilting work at the reservoir to prepare the land for the entrepreneur zone. There were also reports in newspapers,  that the reclassification application had been kept in abeyance since SIDCO and CMDA had not adhered to due process in the application process.

Why is the land use reclassification drawing flak from Chennaiites? The answer is clear: CMDA was not transparent in granting permission for the project on the environmentally-sensitive land at Red Hills Reservoir.

CMDA’s opaque and insidious reclassification procedure

In our previous articles on zoning, we have explained the procedure to be followed for reclassification of land. The procedure followed by CMDA to reclassify the Red Hills land (survey numbers: 44/1, 45 and 175/1) is illegal, our analysis suggests. 

Mandatory rules to reclassify land Did CMDA follow it?
Publishing the reclassification request in newspapers  Yes. On 3 August this year, CMDA published an advertisement on the seventh page of an English daily. 
Seeking responses from the general public Yes. The published advertisement asked citizens to write to the planning authority. Several citizens did write in, and received an acknowledgement from CMDA.
Examining responses/ objections No. The CMDA misrepresented, in response to an RTI application, that it did not receive any objection.
Organising public consultation Not organised
In its newspaper notification on August 3, CMDA had listed 15 proposals for land use change, one of which was SIDCO’s. And activists wrote to the CMDA objecting to many of these proposals. However, when an RTI applicant sought information on the proposals that received objections, CMDA mentioned only one project by the private developer Blue Nile Properties. It conveniently avoided mentioning the objections received against the Red Hills project, though many citizens had filed these. Here are the objections filed by activist Prasanth Goutham, for example.

“CMDA’s move to ‘develop’ the Red hills catchment area comes at a time when Chennai is witnessing a cycle of floods and drought. What is shocking is that the department lied outright to get the work done. This shows the department is only following these procedures as a formality,” said Prashanth Goutham.

Organisations like Arappor Iyakkam and Citizen consumer and civic Action Group (CAG), had also filed their objections with CMDA, requesting a reversal of the decision. “Whether CMDA intends to entertain our objections will be known only when they pass an order that the reclassification attempt stands cancelled and no further reclassification attempts of any kind on water bodies and associated lands will be attempted in the future,” Goutham said.

A self destructive move

Red Hills Lake, with a storage capacity of  3300 mcft (million cubic feet) is an important reservoir for Chennai. It holds rainwater, and the excess water reaches Kosasthalaiyar river. 

The catchment area of Red Hills is already encroached – one can see a cattle breeding centre and a forage development centre (both maintained by Tamil Nadu government) encroaching upon the pre-catchment part of the water body.

“The development control rules of CMDA do not permit any sort of development in the catchment area. However, a lot of godowns are set up here. Industrial effluents contaminate the fresh water in the lake,” said S Thirunavakarusu, retired engineer, PWD. 

How would development on the lake affect citizens? “The survey numbers of the land where the women’s entrepreneur zone has been planned is a pre-catchment area of Red Hills. Rainwater reaches the pre-catchment area directly. Encroachment in such areas would alter the characteristics of the lake,  including water storage, tree cover and topography. It will eventually lead to the reduction of water storage levels and aggravate the city’s water crisis,” added Thirunavakarusu.

“The reservoir is also a victim of official inaction, as one can see heaps of garbage dumped and occasionally burnt at its fringes. The boundaries of the lake are not earmarked either, due to which there is unabated encroachment,” said Harris Sultan, a civic activist.   

Officials from the nodal agencies — CMDA and PWD — are unwilling to comment on the issue. It is the duty of the citizens of Chennai to stall development at this important reservoir by filing a petition at the National Green Tribunal. Only a citizen movement can get authorities to rethink their decision.


Laasya Shekhar
About Laasya Shekhar 165 Articles
Laasya Shekhar is Senior Reporter at Citizen Matters Chennai. She tweets at @plaasya.

3 Comments

  1. Chennai population is alarming. water water water is the essence of the human beings in Chennai. the local administration instead of preserving it for water storage, if it goes for industries, they are making the people of Chennai for thirsty for water. it seems the local administration is going against the principle of providing water for the people living in Chennai. god alone save the people of Chennai or the high court and the legal bodies should come forward for the protection of the people of Chennai.

  2. Why do the authorities in Chennai keep doing this repeatedly. Encroaching upon vital catchment areas is a very bad move, ill-thought and sinister. If CMDA is going to turn a blind eye to this blatantly unwise move, it is better that this agency is wound up once for all. The common man’s interests and that too in a year when water woes have hit chennaites the hardest in living memory. Courts are our only protection. An immediate stay is required from the courts to stop this nefarious activity proposed in a vital water catchment area…

  3. The Supreme Court’s order to demolish high buildings in Maradu Panchayat division in Ernakulam constructed against violations of rules in Coastal Zone is an eye opener. Besides taking up the issue with the NGT, writ petitions must be filed in the Court so as to restrain the CMDA/the government from granting permission to construct buildings at catchment areas. The legal luminaries should help the citizens concerned with such constructions to fight the case pro bono.

Comments are closed.