Will shoddy design prove a dampener for Chennai’s Metro pride?

CHENNAI METRO LAPSES

Our work is to empower citizens, made possible by your donation. Click to Donate
Representational image. Pic: Wikimedia Commons

Let us make it quite clear at the outset – we are delighted that the city has a metro rail service in operation, albeit a mere fraction of what ought to have been running by now. Those who use the facility profess to be quite happy with it – it saves time, the stations are clean and Chennai Metro Rail Limited has also organised some kind of last-mile connectivity by pressing into service local auto-rickshaws and taxicabs. But what is of worry, apart from the high fares, is the shoddy workmanship of the stations and the numerous technical glitches that the actual operation itself suffers from.

Advertisement

True, the latter can be teething troubles, but not the former. There is really no excuse for poor quality construction.

A correspondent who specialises in civil projects has actually taken the pains to go around the stations and photographically document some of what has gone wrong. These range from major to minor lapses. Among the former you would include unfinished concrete cladding, thereby exposing mild-steel handrails.

Also in this category would be water-logging due to improper finishing of the surfaces of the stations. The ceilings are already disfigured even though the monsoon has not arrived. Exposed metal bars that form the actual skeleton of the station structures pose a bigger threat in the long term – these can corrode, thereby weakening the buildings themselves.

Of more immediate concern are the falling roof tiles and cracking window panes, both of which have become routine occurrences. These have injured a few commuters as well. No less an authority than IIT Madras has been moved to comment that all of these are indications of poor workmanship.

CMRL responded with patchwork – removing fifty tiles that were identified as likely to fall and covering all the exposed spaces with cement and paint. The idea of replacing with new tiles was given up. If that be the case, why was tiling done in the first place at an added expense? There are several minor issues as well – improperly finished junction boxes and switches, crooked signboards and gaping holes in station display panels. Not many are likely to notice these, but those who do are left unimpressed.

There have been operation glitches as well. The signalling systems failed three days running in one week of October, resulting in trains being delayed. Irate commuters had no choice but to take to bus transport, thereby negating the very purpose of the Metro. The level of air-conditioning has also come in for complaint. The stations are invariably hot, leaving commuters enervated. As for the staff, who have to spend the whole day underground, their plight can only be imagined.

CMRL has responded to this complaint by stating that the air-conditioning system is only partially operational. Many of its units are turned off to save power as the commuter traffic still remains low. The question then arises that if this be the quality of cooling with low patronage, how will it be when the Metro runs to full capacity?

A second reason for the warmth in the stations once again points to shoddy design – the hot air in the tunnels apparently seeps through gaps in the station doors, thereby heating up the public areas. In a hot city like Chennai, surely this ought to have been thought through even at the design stage? It is too late now to do anything about it.

CMRL has to seriously do some rethinking and set right lapses at least in the forthcoming stations. We really do not need yet another poorly designed public facility.

[This article was first published in Madras Musings, issue dated November 16 -30 and has been republished with permission. For the original article and photos, click here.]

About V Sriram 10 Articles
V Sriram is an entrepreneur, columnist, music historian and heritage activist who is known for his books on the history of Chennai, Carnatic music and Chennai theatre. He is also known for his blog on Chennai heritage, and is the Editor of Madras Musings.

3 Comments

  1. Instead of complaining why doesn’t a common person benefit from a mode of transportation. The more people use it the more money is going to be spent on maintenance. Take a look at the MRTS and the metro. They have done a lot more and they are in expansion mode. All everyone does is complain here.

    • Comparison of Metro with MRTS is like comparing apples and oranges. For example, Rs 5 gets me to Beach from Thirumylai. I have to fork double that amount to get into a Metro train.

  2. I really wonder why should it be taken as a complaint? It is a feedback given by the team spending so much time in public interest. We need to appreciate them for bringing to the notice of the public and the government to correct these faults and ensure safety. Will you or me accept flaws in the construction of a house we buy considering that we would be benefiting from this as a kind of shelter and proposed amenities around the flawed shelter? Let’s be thoughtful and have longer vision.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*